Even though the Hampton Synagogue's application to establish an eruv chatzerot encompassing a sizable chunk of "mainland" Westhampton Beach South of the Highway, has been on-hold for the past month, thanks to a full page advertisement in the current Southampton Press Western Edition, it is again on full roil.
While only WCBS-TV covered it with a snide and superficial story a month ago, a number of others, from Newsday to Dan's to Jewish Week, are now all over it, with more to come.
"I've even been interviewed by Al Jazeera," said Richard Haefeli, who represents the Temple in their application before the Village.
Rabbi Marc Schneier's stated purpose in suspending the process, was….
"I shall use this summer to extend the hands of friendship across the faiths and educate all segments of the Westhampton Beach community to precisely what the eruv
" is, and what it is not and should not represent to its detractors.
While he was firming up his strategy, an ad hoc group calling themselves "Westhampton Beach¹ Alliance for the Separation of Church and State" has stolen a march on him with their full page adv., and the Rabbi's avowed task could now become that much harder.
Or not.
Initial feedback suggests that the Alliance's media campaign… more messages are planned according to the the adv.'s author, Craig Middleton… is not playing well² with a number of residents, so there could be a backlash.
The most interesting part here is how the current Village Board is positioned on the matter.
Trustees Joan Levan and Toni-Jo Birk, vying for "leadership status" on the issue since it was first formally presented to the Board, are tersely opposed, both voting "No" when Mayor Conrad Teller unexpectedly called the vote at the May 1st meeting.
Trustee Hank Tucker still seems open on the matter, voting against the Mayor's motion on procedural grounds, but past performance suggests that he will follow Mrs. Levan's lead.
That leaves the Mayor and Deputy Mayor James Kametler, both of whom were unequivocally in support of the eruv at that meeting, as confirmed by the video record.
But then at an Alliance meeting at Irene Barrett's Quiogue home, Mr. Kametler must have succeeded in convincing those assembled that he was actually against the eruv, because the bottom half of the advertisement³ was by default, in support of his re-election.
In addition to raising alarums and scarums about an opponent of the Deputy Mayor, John Roland, so too was Mayor Teller's opponent, Tim Laube, tarred with the "a vote for either is a vote for the eruv" brush.
Which leads to the question of how the Alliance reconciles its hostility to Mr. Laube's candidacy with this message from Mayor Teller in Jewish Week:
"I have no objection if the public isn't 100 percent against it. I mean I work for the public, but right now I still don't see any major fault with it. I probably won't get elected for saying that. I don't see any fault with it."
While there are signs of a certain amount of "wiggle room" in that statement, unless Mr. Kametler and Administration flunky Ralph Newbauer carried a private "I'm with you!" message from the Mayor to the Alliance, the group has caused itself significant credibility problems.
But in that same Jewish Week article is found crafty Con Teller's ultimate solution to whether or not the Synagogue gets its eruv in Westhampton Beach:
"Teller didn't rule out placing the matter before the voters in the form of a referendum…."
With the guidance of the vox populi, it would absolve Village Government of responsibility for the decision, something the Administration could point to if legal action ensues.
It would also suit Jacqueline Sprotte, an early eruv questioner, who urged such an approach at the Village Board's April Work Session.
Which would leave the Synagogue and the Alliance battling it out for the voters' hearts and minds until a referendum would be held later this Summer.
Notes
¹.- The actual membership of the Alliance seems to be less Westhampton Beach residents than non-residents or second home owners who vote elsewhere.
².- But then, it is unknown how many new supporters have contacted co-chairs Middleton and Els Rentmeister, or their nutburger associate, Irene Barrett, who's been at the front of the anti-eruv charge from the jump.
³.- Since it is an overtly political advertisement, some are wondering if the Alliance had pre-registered as a Political Action Committee, as required by law, with the Suffolk County Board of Elections.